Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.135/2022

Case between Maryamma Augustine vs Dhani Loans and Services Limited regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-25
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Maryamma Augustine filed a petition for eviction against Dhani Loans and Services Limited for defaulting on rent payments. The petitioner seeks to regain possession of the rented property located in Edappally.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed as the respondent failed to appear in court and pay the arrears. The petitioner is entitled to regain possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was allowed as the respondent failed to appear in court and pay the arrears. The petitioner is entitled to regain possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved default in rent payments and the cessation of occupation of the property by the respondent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved default in rent payments and the cessation of occupation of the property by the respondent.
Supporting Evidence
It is evident that the respondent has committed default in paying the arrears of rent and also ceased to occupy the petition schedule building continuously for a period of 6 months.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Maryamma Augustine
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhani Loans and Services Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal acknowledgment.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju Martin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to put the landlord / petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is again directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord / petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(4)(v) of the Act.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the notice sent to the respondent demanding payment of arrears and surrender of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Maryamma Augustine vs Dhani Loans and Services Limited regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Maryamma Augustine vs Dhani Loans and Services Limited regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 09/13/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Aadil Manzur Arampulickal vs George Kurian Arikody regarding eviction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Anu Mariam Kuruvilla vs Mrs. Anaswara Nishad regarding eviction.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Bejoy Ramakrishnan vs Resila Madhavan regarding eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.K. Hariharan vs Amalu C.S. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Sanuber vs Mr. Deepak P.P. regarding eviction and rent arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won