Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No.135/2022

Case between Maryamma Augustine vs Dhani Loans and Services Limited regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-25
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Maryamma Augustine filed a petition for eviction against Dhani Loans and Services Limited for defaulting on rent payments. The petitioner seeks to regain possession of the rented property located in Edappally.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed as the respondent failed to appear in court and pay the arrears. The petitioner is entitled to regain possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved default in rent payments and the cessation of occupation of the property by the respondent.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Maryamma Augustine (75 years) Valavanthuruthel House, Edappally P.O., pin­682 024

Defendants

Dhani Loans and Services Limited (Age not specified years) Reg: Office­M 62 & 63, First Floor, Connaught Place, New Delhi­110001 & C.C. Door No.41/146, Third Floor, VEE VEE Towers, Edappally P.O., N.H Bye Pass, Kochi­682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to put the landlord / petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is again directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord / petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(4)(v) of the Act.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the notice sent to the respondent demanding payment of arrears and surrender of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 09/13/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases