Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 174 /2024

Case between Mrs. Sanuber vs Mr. Deepak P.P. regarding eviction and rent arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mrs. Sanuber, the landlord, filed a petition against Mr. Deepak P.P., the tenant, for eviction due to non-payment of rent and lack of proper lease renewal. The tenant continued to occupy the property after the lease expired and accrued significant rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to the tenant's failure to pay rent and follow lease renewal protocols. The tenant was ordered to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from the date of the order.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided sufficient evidence of unpaid rent and the tenant's failure to renew the lease.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Sanuber (58 years) M.I.G-6, Fort Nagar, Fort Kochi P.O., Pin- 682 001, Ernakulam

Defendants

Mr. Deepak P.P. (35 years) "Travcafe Holidays", Room No: 6, Door No: CC-66/5848, 1 st Floor, "YASANA ESTATE", TD Road -Gopalaprabhu Road Junction, Ernakulam-682 035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed as evidence to demonstrate the notice given to the respondent regarding rental arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim by providing proof of sending notices to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the notices sent to the respondent were returned unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Intended to establish the terms of the lease but was rejected for lack of proper foundation for secondary evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 04/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases