Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 167/2024

Case between Aadil Manzur Arampulickal vs George Kurian Arikody regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-10-23
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition for eviction filed by Aadil Manzur Arampulickal against George Kurian Arikody. The petitioner, who is the owner of an apartment, seeks to reclaim possession due to the respondent's failure to vacate at the end of the lease term and non-compliance with housing association rules.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The defendant is directed to vacate the property within 30 days and the petitioner is entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the property within 30 days.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated bona fide need for the property and established ownership and the respondent's failure to comply with the lease agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed in part u/S.11 (3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Aadil Manzur Arampulickal (18 years) 86/788 (1), Chakka Junction, Pettah Post Office, Trivandrum -24

Defendants

George Kurian Arikody (72 years) Flat 5 B with Thrikkakara Municipality No. (X111/676), (now renumbered as XIII/681) Safyr Bleu Apartments, Athani, Kakkanad, Pin-682030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The petitioner requested eviction of the respondent from the apartment.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to the relief as prayed for under section 11(3) of the Act.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought costs for the eviction proceedings.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the petitioner's ownership of the apartment, which is central to his claim for eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the respondent's acknowledgment of the need to vacate the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases