Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 23/2025

Case between Mrs. Anu Mariam Kuruvilla vs Mrs. Anaswara Nishad regarding eviction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Anu Mariam Kuruvilla, is seeking eviction of the respondent, Mrs. Anaswara Nishad, from a residential property due to non-payment of rent. The petitioner requires the property for her own personal occupation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition for eviction, granting the petitioner possession of the apartment within 30 days. The petitioner will also receive costs from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlady/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's evidence of rent arrears and personal necessity was accepted without rebuttal.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Anu Mariam Kuruvilla (46 years) 4A, Kamadhenu Apartment, Kaloor, Kadavanthara, Pin-682020

Defendants

Mrs. Anaswara Nishad (32 years) Apartment 6E, 6th Floor, Sapphire Heights Apartments, Palachode Road, Vennala, Vennala P.O, Ernakulam, Pin-682028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner was granted eviction from the premises occupied by the respondent.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlady/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original agreement dated 15.12.2023 was used to establish the tenancy and the terms of the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of the lawyer's notice dated 14.10.2024 was used to demonstrate the demand for arrears and request for vacating the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original acknowledgment card was accepted as evidence to support the petitioner's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases