Case Summary
Manoj Paul, the petitioner, seeks compliance from the respondent, Nishana Abdul Salim, regarding unpaid rent arrears. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with previous orders leading to the closure of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner is granted possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has stopped all further proceedings in the rent control petition and directed the respondent to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court order regarding rent payment as per Section 12(3) of the Act.
The respondent failed to comply with the court order regarding rent payment as per Section 12(3) of the Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manoj Paul
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nishana Abdul Salim
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
NA
Defendants Documents
NA
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dibesh R.Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph George A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K. Revi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Helan Paulose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jomol Pius
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manoj Paul vs Nishana Abdul Salim regarding rent control and possession.
Case Code Year
Case between Manoj Paul vs Nishana Abdul Salim regarding rent control and possession.