Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 162 OF 2017

Case between Manoharan.C vs Abdul Khadar regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Manoharan.C and Entheenkutty, are involved in a suit for injunction against defendants Abdul Khadar and Prakash.R. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs were not present or represented and thus dismissed the suit for default. Consequently, no injunction was granted.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs were not present or represented and thus dismissed the suit for default. Consequently, no injunction was granted.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's counsel submitted no-instruction, leading to their absence in court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's counsel submitted no-instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent, not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manoharan.C
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o Balakrishnan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Entheenkutty
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o Kaladi Ali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Khadar
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o Muhammedali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prakash.R.
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o C.Rajappan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vipin.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manoharan.C vs Abdul Khadar regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Manoharan.C vs Abdul Khadar regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 01/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won