Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 162 OF 2017

Case between Manoharan.C vs Abdul Khadar regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Manoharan.C and Entheenkutty, are involved in a suit for injunction against defendants Abdul Khadar and Prakash.R. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs were not present or represented and thus dismissed the suit for default. Consequently, no injunction was granted.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's counsel submitted no-instruction, leading to their absence in court.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Manoharan.C (55 years) Chengott House, Thrikkandiyur amsom desom and Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 104 Entheenkutty (62 years) Kaladi House, Thanalur amsom Meenadathur desom and Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 307

Defendants

Abdul Khadar (47 years) Thekkepurath House, Thrikkandiyur amsom Thekkumuri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 105 Prakash.R. (41 years) Pareparambil House, Thrikkandiyur amsom Thekkumuri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases