ORIGINAL SUIT No. 180 OF 2016

Case between Manath Yoosaf vs Ambattu Saidalavi et al regarding Injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K.

Order Date

2019-02-28

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by Manath Yoosaf against Ambattu Saidalavi and others regarding an injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence. There was no representation from the plaintiff during the proceedings.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence. There was no representation from the plaintiff during the proceedings.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal for default.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal for default.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 28th day of February, 2019).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Manath Yoosaf
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ambattu Saidalavi
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Munas
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Naseema
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Gopinathan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.Vipin.K.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Suit dismissed for default.

Evidence: