Case Summary
Three plaintiffs sought injunction against two defendants who were absent during the hearing resulting in the suit being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissing the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs to the defendants due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed with costs of the defendants.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahesh
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o. Ayyappan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahendrakumar
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o. Ayyappan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nishanth
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o. Ayyappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asyamol
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o. Koya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koya
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
Not available
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahesh et al vs Asyamol et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mahesh et al vs Asyamol et al regarding injunction