Case Summary
Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario filed a rent control petition against Prasad Joseph Daniel for non-compliance with a prior order to deposit rent arrears. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the order and has not shown sufficient cause.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court stopped all further proceedings in the rent control petition due to the respondent's non-compliance with the order to pay rent arrears. The respondent was directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasad Joseph Daniel
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition, Vakalath, Document
Defendants Documents
Vakalath
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Sanjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sindhu Krishnah C.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alex John Pulimood
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sunil Nair Palakkat
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.N. Abhilash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tintu K.M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreelakshmi Menon P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anu Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sneha Elsa Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario vs Prasad Joseph Daniel regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario vs Prasad Joseph Daniel regarding Rent Control Petition