Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 47/2024

Case between Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario vs Prasad Joseph Daniel regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
approximately-1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario filed a rent control petition against Prasad Joseph Daniel for non-compliance with a prior order to deposit rent arrears. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the order and has not shown sufficient cause.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court stopped all further proceedings in the rent control petition due to the respondent's non-compliance with the order to pay rent arrears. The respondent was directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Leo Lilly Blosom Rozario (57 years years) H.No. XL/5000, High Court Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682031

Defendants

Prasad Joseph Daniel (60 years years) 'Fathima Matha Photostat Centre' bearing Door No.67/3524, Opposite Gate No.3, High Court Road, Ernakulam, Pin:682031 Residing at Deepam House, Vyloppilly Land, Azad Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam-682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases