Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 155/2022

Case between Lekha Sudhakaran Menon vs Laisa Vaguez regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lekha Sudhakaran Menon filed a petition for eviction against Laisa Vaguez under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that the respondent did not comply with previous orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property and hand it over to the landlord due to non-compliance with previous orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property and hand it over to the landlord due to non-compliance with previous orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not show sufficient cause for not complying with the court's previous orders.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not show sufficient cause for not complying with the court's previous orders.
Supporting Evidence
No sufficient show cause is also shown, though sufficient time is given.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed. Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lekha Sudhakaran Menon
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laisa Vaguez
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition for eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Muhammed Rafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Kumar. P.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed, and the tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lekha Sudhakaran Menon vs Laisa Vaguez regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Lekha Sudhakaran Menon vs Laisa Vaguez regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Babu. K. Putheth vs Muhammed Rameez M.J. regarding eviction under Section 11(2) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Renjini S. vs RaphiMon M.E. regarding eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between T.V. Devaprasad vs View Point Life Styles et al regarding Eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mary Philomina P.G. vs Harisree Trading Company regarding Eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob Vadakel vs Mr. V P Jackson regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won