Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 155/2022

Case between Lekha Sudhakaran Menon vs Laisa Vaguez regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lekha Sudhakaran Menon filed a petition for eviction against Laisa Vaguez under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that the respondent did not comply with previous orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property and hand it over to the landlord due to non-compliance with previous orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not show sufficient cause for not complying with the court's previous orders.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed. Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Lekha Sudhakaran Menon (52 years) Paramparambath House, Kaloor, Ernakulam District – 686 668

Defendants

Laisa Vaguez (Age not specified years) Malliyekkal House, Father name not known Cherumuttam, Palarivattom, Ernakulam District­682025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed, and the tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases