Case Summary
The plaintiff, Lathika.V, filed for an injunction against the defendants Asha Latha, Thresyamma Antony, and Sebastain Antony. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and had no representation during the hearing. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lathika.V
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asha Latha
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thresyamma Antony
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sebastain Antony
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepthi.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreelatha.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Greeshma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Seenathu Beegum
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff filed for injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lathika.V vs Asha Latha et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Lathika.V vs Asha Latha et al regarding injunction