Case Summary
Laisa, the petitioner, claims that the respondent, Babu K.N., has failed to comply with a court order regarding rent arrears. The court has stopped proceedings due to this non-compliance and ordered the respondent to vacate the building.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has determined that the respondent failed to comply with the previous court order regarding rent payments and, consequently, has ordered the respondent to vacate the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the court's order to pay rent arrears.
The respondent did not comply with the court's order to pay rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the court's order to pay rent arrears.
The respondent did not comply with the court's order to pay rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
the respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 3/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Laisa
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu K.N.
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.R. Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.S. Letha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anu Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kurian Maxie
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham P. George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M. Santhy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rishabh Dilraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vishnu j.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Preethy Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Laisa vs Babu K.N. regarding compliance with rent control order
Case Code Year
Case between Laisa vs Babu K.N. regarding compliance with rent control order