Case Summary
The petitioners, K.V. Thomas and others, are seeking compliance from the respondents, M/s. ALTAIM and Anas P A, regarding unpaid rent arrears. The court found that the respondents failed to comply with previous orders to remit the rent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioners are to be put in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court determined that the respondents failed to comply with the order regarding rent payment. Consequently, it ordered the respondents to vacate the premises and stopped further proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents did not comply with the court's order regarding the payment of rent arrears.
The respondents did not comply with the court's order regarding the payment of rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents did not comply with the court's order regarding the payment of rent arrears.
The respondents did not comply with the court's order regarding the payment of rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondents having failed to comply with the order in IA.01/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondents to put the petitioners in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.V. Thomas
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Myrtle Thomas
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vivek Thomas
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. ALTAIM
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anas P A
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Order in IA.01/2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiju Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu T.M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sachu Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anaina Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Sajeevan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Athira Sajeevan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Niyatha Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Francis K.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prvitha T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondents to put the petitioners in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondents to put the petitioners in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s. ALTAIM et al regarding rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s. ALTAIM et al regarding rent arrears