Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 325 OF 2014

Case between Kunnath Rukkiya vs Kalparambil Muhammedali's children regarding Injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-09-13
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Wed, 09/13/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kunnath Rukkiya, 70 years old, filed a suit for injunction against defendants Salahudheen and Musthafa, seeking court's intervention to prevent certain actions. However, the plaintiff was absent during the final hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the plaintiff during the final hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the plaintiff during the final hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for Injunction. Counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunnath Rukkiya
Party Age
70
Relation
Daughter of Muhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salahudheen
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthafa
Party Age
43
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction dismissed with costs due to absence during final hearing
Evidence:
Suit for Injunction. Counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunnath Rukkiya vs Kalparambil Muhammedali's children regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunnath Rukkiya vs Kalparambil Muhammedali's children regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/13/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 09/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 09/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won