Case Summary
Krishnan Chettiar filed a suit for injunction against Unnikrishnan @ Mani. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence. No further details on the merits of the case were provided.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishnan Chettiar
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan @ Mani
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Nanadakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.T.Ajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sumi.O.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.Bhavesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff sought an injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is one for injunction. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnan Chettiar vs Unnikrishnan @ Mani regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnan Chettiar vs Unnikrishnan @ Mani regarding injunction