Case Summary
The petitioner, Krishnakumar, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Rohith Viswam. The parties entered into a settlement during mediation, agreeing on terms regarding the possession of a rental property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful agreement which the court found convincing.
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful agreement which the court found convincing.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(4)(ii) of the Act as follows: The respondent is hereby directed to comply the terms in compromise, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Krishnakumar (56 years years)
Krishnasree, Poonithura P.O., Ernakulam, Pin 682 038
Defendants
Rohith Viswam (32 years years)
Nandanam, Karayogam Lane, Poonithura P.O., Petta, Ernakulam, Pin 682038
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is hereby directed to comply with the terms in compromise, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(4)(ii) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent is hereby directed to comply the terms in compromise, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
No order as to costs.
Evidence:
In the facts and circumstance of this case there shall be no order as to costs.