Case Summary
The petitioner, Krishnakumar, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Rohith Viswam. The parties entered into a settlement during mediation, agreeing on terms regarding the possession of a rental property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the rent control petition based on the compromise agreement reached during mediation. The respondent is directed to comply with the terms of the agreement regarding the possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful agreement which the court found convincing.
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful agreement which the court found convincing.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful agreement which the court found convincing.
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful agreement which the court found convincing.
Supporting Evidence
This court is convinced that the parties have entered into the agreement voluntarily and signed by all the parties in the rent control petition. The terms are lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(4)(ii) of the Act as follows: The respondent is hereby directed to comply the terms in compromise, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishnakumar
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rohith Viswam
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.M. Nowfal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fousiya Rayinmakki
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. Asif
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreelakshmi P.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is hereby directed to comply with the terms in compromise, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(4)(ii) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent is hereby directed to comply the terms in compromise, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
No order as to costs.
Evidence:
In the facts and circumstance of this case there shall be no order as to costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnakumar vs Rohith Viswam regarding Rent Control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnakumar vs Rohith Viswam regarding Rent Control petition.
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement