Case Summary
Multiple plaintiffs filed a suit for partition, but as the plaintiff was absent and had no representation, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Suit dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed due to the absence and lack of representation from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation, Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kousallya
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- D/o Valiyaveettil Achunni, W/o Nallakkara Padiyath Karunakaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devaki
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o Valiya Veettil Deceased Vijayan
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of property sought
Evidence:
Not available
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Kousallya et al vs Devaki et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Kousallya et al vs Devaki et al regarding partition