Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 19/2025

Case between K.M Aneena vs Khaulath Abdul Kareem regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.M Aneena filed a petition against Khaulath Abdul Kareem under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The matter was settled between the parties, and the respondent surrendered vacant possession.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a memo stating that the matter was settled and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted a memo stating that the matter was settled and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Parties settled the matter and the respondent surrendered possession.
Why Defendant Won:
Parties settled the matter and the respondent surrendered possession.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits matter settled between parties and respondent surrendered vacant possession with keys.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.M Aneena
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khaulath Abdul Kareem
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.M Sajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athul G.T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashitha Pauly
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Robert Dias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Divya M.P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreejith Cherote
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Memo accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.M Aneena vs Khaulath Abdul Kareem regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between K.M Aneena vs Khaulath Abdul Kareem regarding Rent Control Petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown