Case Summary
K.K. Mammu filed a petition against Sudheesh for non-compliance with a rent payment order. The court found that Sudheesh failed to comply with the order and has not shown sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the proceedings in the rent control petition be stopped and directed the respondent to hand over vacant possession of the building to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 1/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith. RCP is closed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.K. Mammu
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudheesh
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition, Vakalath, Petition
Defendants Documents
Petition, Vakalath
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.C. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Laxy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.G. Cleetus
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ann Mariya Roy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Direction to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.K. Mammu vs Sudheesh regarding compliance with rent payment
Case Code Year
Case between K.K. Mammu vs Sudheesh regarding compliance with rent payment