Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 6 OF 2019

Case between Kayakutty Haji vs Shamsudheen Cholakkal regarding eviction of premises

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-11-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kayakutty Haji filed a petition against Shamsudheen Cholakkal for eviction of a rented property due to non-payment of rent and sub-letting. The petitioner requires the property for his son to start a business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within three months and pay the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the building to be given to the petitioner within three months, and costs granted.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established bona fide need for the eviction as the respondent was using the property in a manner that diminishes its value.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under Sections 11(2), 11(3), 11(4)(i) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner within three months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kayakutty Haji (65 years) Thottiparamba House, Kanhipura, Athavanad desom, PO. Karipole, 676 552, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Shamsudheen Cholakkal (55 years) Cholakkal House, Kanhirakutty, Paravaanna amsom, desom, PO. Paravanna, Tirur Taluk, 676 502

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. After considering the evidence,... the petitioner is entitled for an order of eviction under Sections 11(2), 11 (3), 11 (4) (i) and 11 (4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to recover the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
the petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner within three months from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order under Section 11 (2) (b) vacated on deposit of arrears of rent.
Evidence:
The order under Section 11 (2) (b) shall be vacated on deposit of arrears of rent within one month from the date of this order.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the respondent demanding the surrender of vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt confirming the mailing of the lawyer notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card confirming the receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(c)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report filed by the advocate commissioner inspecting the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch related to the commission report for the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
TIRUR
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases