Case Summary
Karunakaran.P, the plaintiff, filed a suit against P. Shanil Kumar seeking injunction. The plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client resulting in dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Karunakaran.P
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhikannan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P. Shanil Kumar
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o. Karunakaran.P
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Sree Hari
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karunakaran.P vs P. Shanil Kumar regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Karunakaran.P vs P. Shanil Kumar regarding injunction