Case Summary
Plaintiff Karthikveettil Sainaba filed a suit for injunction against defendants Rubeena and Kunhimuhammed. However, as plaintiff's counsel had no instructions and plaintiff was absent, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and counsel had no instructions.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Karthikveettil Sainaba
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o. Hamza (late)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rubeena
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o. Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit for injunction was dismissed as per the judgment.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karthikveettil Sainaba vs Rubeena, Kunhimuhammed regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Karthikveettil Sainaba vs Rubeena, Kunhimuhammed regarding injunction