Case Summary
The case involves Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa as the plaintiff and Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob along with K.P. Hameed as defendants. The plaintiff sought an injunction, but the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence. Costs were imposed on the plaintiff for the dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.P. Hameed
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.A. Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Suresh. A. Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anil Lal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa vs Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa vs Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob et al regarding Injunction