Case Summary
Plaintiff filed a suit seeking injunction but due to absence of plaintiff and lack of instructions to counsel, the suit was dismissed with costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of instruction to counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa
- Party Age
- 51
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o. Cheriyachamveettil Puthan Veettil Kunhimon
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.P. Hameed
- Relation
- S/o. Pazhayakath Enudheen kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa and others vs Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob and K.P. Hameed regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa and others vs Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob and K.P. Hameed regarding injunction