Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 150 OF 2018

Case between Kammukutty et al vs Muhammedali et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-06-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Kammukutty and his family as plaintiffs against Muhammedali and others as defendants. The suit was for an injunction, which has been settled.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction has been settled. The terms of the settlement have been verified and deemed lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decreed as per the terms of Razi
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction has been settled. The terms of the settlement have been verified and deemed lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Matter settled and terms verified as lawful
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Matter settled and terms verified as lawful
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled. Raji filed. Verified the terms of Razi and found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed as per the terms of Razi. Raji form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kammukutty
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o 1st Plaintiff
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammedali
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salmath
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o 1st defendant
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Illias.C.K.M.
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasik
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajitha
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o Prabhakaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Praveen.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vimal kumar.K.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.P.Ravoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.E.Mohammed Rafi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit for injunction decreed as per the terms of Razi.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed as per the terms of Razi.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kammukutty et al vs Muhammedali et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kammukutty et al vs Muhammedali et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won