ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 388 OF 2015

Case between Kamalbasha et al vs Yoosaf et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-31
Duration
2 years
Case Closed
Sat, 03/31/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction against defendants, which was subsequently dismissed as the matter was almost settled.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the matter was almost settled.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the matter was almost settled.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Defendant present. Plaintiff not present. Matter almost settled. Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kamalbasha
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o. Muhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kadeeja
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o. Kamalbasha
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saliha
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o. Bapputty
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rincy
Party Age
25
Relation
D/o. Haridasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yoosaf
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o. Abdulla
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Basheer
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o. Muhammed @ Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o. Muhammed Kutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.M. T. Bava
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Abdurehman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed @ Bava
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o. Kunhimammi @ Imbichi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haridasan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o. Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Vipin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Neethu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
Defendant present. Plaintiff not present. Matter almost settled. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kamalbasha et al vs Yoosaf et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kamalbasha et al vs Yoosaf et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 03/31/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/31/2018 - 12:00
From
Thu, 03/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 03/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Thalhath.K et al vs Programme Committee et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial