Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 98 OF 2017

Case between Kalliyath Saidalavi vs Abdul Gafoor regarding Injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-13
Duration
Less than a year
Case Closed
Tue, 01/30/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kalliyath Saidalavi filed a suit for an injunction against defendant Abdul Gafoor. The matter was settled between the parties with the defendant agreeing to vacate the property by a specified date.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was decreed as per the terms of the lawful compromise, with the defendant agreeing to vacate the property by January 30, 2018.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was decreed as per the terms of the lawful compromise, with the defendant agreeing to vacate the property by January 30, 2018.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise IA 2949/2017 filed. Defendant has agreed to vacate the property on or before 30-1-2018. Since the terms of the compromise is lawful, suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kalliyath Saidalavi
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Gafoor
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vivek.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. E.C. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought injunction, defendant agreed to vacate the property by a specified date. The suit was decreed based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise IA 2949/2017 filed. Defendant has agreed to vacate the property on or before 30-1-2018. Since the terms of the compromise is lawful, suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kalliyath Saidalavi vs Abdul Gafoor regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kalliyath Saidalavi vs Abdul Gafoor regarding Injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/30/2018 - 12:00
From
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won