ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 314 OF 2015

Case between Kaliyekkal Saithalikutty Haji et al vs Thadathil Parambil Bharathan et al regarding injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V., LL.B.

Order Date

2017-06-07

Duration

2 years

Case Closed

Wed, 06/07/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought injunction against defendants. Plaintiff's counsel reported lack of instructions, plaintiff absent, no representation, suit dismissed with costs.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Injunction suit dismissed with costs

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

Suit dismissed with costs

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation. Defendants counsel represented. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kaliyekkal Saithalikutty Haji
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o. Moideen Kutty

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Parekkunnath Basheer
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o. Ummer Haji

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Thadathil Parambil Bharathan
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o. Parangodan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aneesh
Party Age: 30

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pradeep
Party Age: 28

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit for injunction dismissed with costs.

Evidence: