Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 314 OF 2015

Case between Kaliyekkal Saithalikutty Haji et al vs Thadathil Parambil Bharathan et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., LL.B.
Order Date
2017-06-07
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought injunction against defendants. Plaintiff's counsel reported lack of instructions, plaintiff absent, no representation, suit dismissed with costs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Suit dismissed with costs
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction suit dismissed with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation. Defendants counsel represented. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kaliyekkal Saithalikutty Haji (60 years) Kalpakancheri amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 551 Parekkunnath Basheer (43 years) Kalpakancheri amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 551

Defendants

Thadathil Parambil Bharathan (60 years) Kalpakancheri amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 551 Aneesh (30 years) Kalpakancheri amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 551 Pradeep (28 years) Kalpakancheri amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 551

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed with costs.
Evidence:
Plaintiff's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation. Defendants counsel represented. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 06/07/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases