R.C.P. No. 166/2010

Case between K.A. Antony vs E.S. Jose regarding rent control

Court

THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2024-11-14

Duration

Case Closed

Thu, 11/14/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.A. Antony filed a petition against E.S. Jose concerning a rent control issue. The respondent deposited the rent arrears, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.

Key Reasoning:
The respondent complied with the requirement by depositing the rent.

Why Defendant Won:
The respondent complied with the requirement by depositing the rent.

Supporting Evidence

The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is dismissed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.A. Antony
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: E.S. Jose
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Rent Control Petition and related documents

Defendants Documents

Proof of rent deposit

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: V.C. Joseph
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Paul Kuriakose K
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: T.K. Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent deposited the rent arrears.

Evidence: