Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 166/2010

Case between K.A. Antony vs E.S. Jose regarding rent control

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-11-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.A. Antony filed a petition against E.S. Jose concerning a rent control issue. The respondent deposited the rent arrears, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The respondent complied with the requirement by depositing the rent.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is dismissed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.A. Antony (68 years) Kalluveettil House, Jaison Building, P.T. Usha road, Ernakulam­11

Defendants

E.S. Jose (61 years) Erasseril House, residing at Kaloor PO. Ernakulam Doing business at A 2 Z Sanitary Wares, P.T. Usha road, Ernakulam, Kochi­11

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent deposited the rent arrears.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases