Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 71/2024

Case between K R Mohandas vs Riyas Yusuf regarding rent control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
approximately-1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, K R Mohandas, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Riyas Yusuf, for non-compliance with a payment order. The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property due to failure to comply with rent arrears payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the respondent in default for not complying with the payment order. Consequently, the court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that, the respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 03/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act. Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K R Mohandas (79 years years) Vattathil House, Kanayannur Taluk, S.S. Ashramam Road, Cochin 682018

Defendants

Riyas Yusuf (Age not specified years) Nendrathudiyil House, Ayyappankavu East Road, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam – 682 018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases