Case Summary
The petitioner K R Mohandas filed a rent control petition against the respondent Mushin Ibrahim for non-compliance with a previous order regarding the deposit of rent arrears. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the order and consequently stopped further proceedings and directed the respondent to vacate the premises.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent had failed to comply with a previous order regarding payment of rent arrears. Consequently, the court directed the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent payment.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent payment.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent payment.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of records, no documents or memo filed by the respondent to show that order has been complied by him and till date he has not filed any show cause.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K R Mohandas
- Party Age
- 79
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mushin Ibrahim
- Relation
- C/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.K. Sreejith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Neena C.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.R. S. Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Deena Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Deepa R. Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Radhika Iyer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sona Mariya Paulose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amrutha Premjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K R Mohandas vs Mushin Ibrahim regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between K R Mohandas vs Mushin Ibrahim regarding rent control