Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 176/2021

Case between K. Krishnakumar vs Prince Edasserry regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner K. Krishnakumar filed a petition for eviction against the respondent Prince Edasserry under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The petitioner expressed that he is not pressing the petition, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of above memo, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Krishnakumar
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o. The late K.S.K. Panicker
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prince Edasserry
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o. Sri. Abraham E. George
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antony Mukkath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
O.F. Justin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Athira T.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition for eviction was not pressed by the petitioner.
Evidence:
In the light of above memo, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K. Krishnakumar vs Prince Edasserry regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between K. Krishnakumar vs Prince Edasserry regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Babu. K. Putheth vs Muhammed Rameez M.J. regarding eviction under Section 11(2) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Renjini S. vs RaphiMon M.E. regarding eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between T.V. Devaprasad vs View Point Life Styles et al regarding Eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mary Philomina P.G. vs Harisree Trading Company regarding Eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob Vadakel vs Mr. V P Jackson regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won