Case Summary
Joy K.A. filed a rent control petition against Laiju Mathew and Laijo Mathew regarding non-compliance with an order for payment of rent arrears. The court reviewed the case and found that the respondents failed to comply with the previous order.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondents directed to vacate the property.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the proceedings in the rent control petition be stopped due to the respondents' failure to comply with the previous order. The respondents were directed to vacate the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents did not comply with the court's order and failed to show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondents did not comply with the court's order and failed to show sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
In the instant case, more than two months has elapsed after the order has been passed. So far the respondent did not comply with the order or shown any sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to out the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joy K.A.
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Laiju Mathew
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Laijo Mathew
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese, M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pooja Krishna K.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shanthi John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jiji Nikhil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Direction to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to out the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joy K.A. vs Laiju Mathew et al regarding rent control and compliance
Case Code Year
Case between Joy K.A. vs Laiju Mathew et al regarding rent control and compliance