Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. 76/2024

Case between Joseph N.A @ Joy vs Cochin Glass House et al regarding rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Code No.
76
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph N.A @ Joy, the landlord, filed a petition against Cochin Glass House and its partners for default in rent payments. The petitioner claims that the respondents owe substantial rent arrears since April 2022.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondents to pay the rent arrears. The court found merit in the petitioner's claim of unpaid rent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Direction to pay Rs.3,30,000/- in rent arrears within 30 days and continue monthly payments of Rs.30,000/-.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, directing the respondents to pay the rent arrears. The court found merit in the petitioner's claim of unpaid rent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents defaulted in payment of rent and did not provide sufficient evidence to counter the petitioner's claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents defaulted in payment of rent and did not provide sufficient evidence to counter the petitioner's claims.
Supporting Evidence
It is settled position that a mere denial is not sufficient. The tenant cannot be allowed to wriggle out from the statutory liability under Section 12 of the Act where the rent deed and receipts would quantify an amount, as admitted arrears of rent from the admissions therein.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and a direction is passed under Section 12 (1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act against the respondents as follows; 1) The respondents are hereby directed to pay monthly rent arrears of Rs.3,30,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Thirty Thousand Only) which is due as on 01.06.2025, within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph N.A @ Joy
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cochin Glass House
Relation
represented by its partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Sebastian
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajan Joseph
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement dated 29.07.2017, lawyer's notice dated 21.03.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Mary
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rosy P.F.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Johson Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nelson Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Emil Johson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondents are directed to pay the rent arrears amounting to Rs.3,30,000 within 30 days.
Evidence:
In these circumstances, it is found that the respondents are liable to pay the arrears of rent as found out.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondents shall continue to remit the rent at the rate of Rs.30,000 per month.
Evidence:
The respondents shall continue to remit the rent at the rate of Rs.30,000 per month, which may be subsequently fall due.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the agreed monthly rent of Rs.30,000 and the commencement date of the tenancy.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It indicates the existence of rent arrears and was cited as supporting evidence by the petitioner.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Original Returned Postal Envelopes and Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These items were mentioned to indicate communication issues between the petitioner and respondents.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Oral evidence
Relevance:
The court considered the arguments made by both parties during the hearing.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
R.C.P.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Geetha. P. vs Cinesh Sreedhar regarding eviction due to rent arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod K Mathew vs Jayakumar P.K. regarding eviction and rent arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between David Paul vs Mr. Vinish Thomas regarding eviction and rent arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won