Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. 99/2023

Case between Geetha. P. vs Cinesh Sreedhar regarding eviction due to rent arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Code No.
99
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Geetha. P. filed a petition seeking eviction of Cinesh Sreedhar for non-payment of rent amounting to Rs.9,77,500. The respondent claims he has vacated the premises, while the petitioner contends otherwise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to deposit monthly rent arrears totaling Rs.9,42,460 within 30 days and continue to pay subsequent rent due.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to deposit Rs.9,42,460 and Rs.82,500 as arrears of rent.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to deposit monthly rent arrears totaling Rs.9,42,460 within 30 days and continue to pay subsequent rent due.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence of admitted rent arrears as the respondent failed to provide evidence disputing the dues.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
This court is of the view that the respondent has committed default in paying the monthly rent as found out. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this court is of the view that the arrears of rent as found out can be directed to be deposited in the court till the final adjudication of the RCP.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and a direction is passed under Section 12 (1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act against the respondent as follows; (i) The respondent is hereby directed to deposit monthly rent arrears of Rs.9,42,460/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Forty Two Thousand Four Hundred and Sixty Only) which is due as on 28.02.2025, within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha. P.
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cinesh Sreedhar
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement dated 18.12.2020, legal notice dated 24.06.2023
Defendants Documents
WhatsApp communications exchanged with the petitioner’s husband, Mr.Sudheer

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph John P.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santheep Ankarath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.V. Manuvilsan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naseem Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anju O.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vrinda Lakshamanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to deposit monthly rent arrears of Rs.9,42,460/- within 30 days.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to deposit monthly rent arrears of Rs.9,42,460/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Forty Two Thousand Four Hundred and Sixty Only) which is due as on 28.02.2025, i.e the month of filing of this application, within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to deposit additional monthly rent arrears of Rs.82,500/- within 30 days.
Evidence:
The respondent is also hereby directed to deposit monthly rent arrears of Rs.82,500/- (Rupees Eighty Two Thousand Five Hundred Only) which is due from 01.11.2024 till 01.04.2025, i.e till the month of passing of this order, within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to continue to deposit the arrears of rent at the rate of Rs.27,500/-pm.
Evidence:
The respondent shall also continue to deposit the arrears of rent at the rate of Rs. Rs.27,500/-pm (Rupees Twenty Seven Thousand and Five Hundred Only), which may be subsequently fall due, within 15 days from the date of due till the culmination of rent control proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioner produced the copy of the rent agreement dated 18.12.2020 executed between the petitioner and the respondent which commenced from 01.12.2020.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioner produced the legal notice dated 24.06.2023 sent to the respondent which calls upon the respondent to settle the arrears, along with its postal receipt and acknowledgment card.
Reference:
null
Document Type: WhatsApp Communications
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The respondent contends that he vacated the premises on 31.05.2023, which he claims is evidenced by WhatsApp communications exchanged with the petitioner's husband.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
R.C.P.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod K Mathew vs Jayakumar P.K. regarding eviction and rent arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between David Paul vs Mr. Vinish Thomas regarding eviction and rent arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph N.A @ Joy vs Cochin Glass House et al regarding rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won