Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 76/2024

Case between Joseph N.A @Joy vs Cochin Glass House et al regarding compliance with rent control order

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-18
Duration
approximately-1 month 16 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph N.A @Joy filed a petition against Cochin Glass House and its partners seeking compliance with a rent control order. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the order regarding rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the respondent's failure to comply with the rent payment order resulted in halting further proceedings and directed the respondent to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the building granted to the petitioner
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order concerning rent arrears, justifying the petitioner’s request for relief.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph N.A @Joy (66 years) Nereveettile House, Vazhakkala, Kakkanad P.O., Kochi 682030

Defendants

Cochin Glass House (null years) Chamminikodath House, St. Vincent Covent Road, Palarivattom, Poonithura Village, Kochi -682 025 Sri. Sebastian (68 years) Chamminikodath House, St. Vincent Covent Road, Palarivattom, Poonithura Village, Kochi -682 025 Sajan Joseph (58 years) Komaroth House, Azad Road, Kaloor -682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order stopping further proceedings and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases