Case Summary
The plaintiff, Jayasree Santhosh, is seeking to recover an advance amount of ₹6,00,000 from her sisters, the defendants, who allegedly breached an agreement to sell land. The defendants are accused of selling the property to a third party despite agreeing to sell it to the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay ₹6,00,000 with 9% interest per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to pay the plaintiff the advance amount of ₹6,00,000 with interest. The defendants are further liable for costs of litigation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff presented unchallenged evidence and proof of payment of the advance amount, thereby establishing her claim.
The plaintiff presented unchallenged evidence and proof of payment of the advance amount, thereby establishing her claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff presented unchallenged evidence and proof of payment of the advance amount, thereby establishing her claim.
The plaintiff presented unchallenged evidence and proof of payment of the advance amount, thereby establishing her claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹6,00,000 (Rupees Six Lakhs only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayasree Santhosh
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajamma
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajamma
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seema Mahesh
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Agreement executed between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.R.Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.S.Letha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jency Suson Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Srinath V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vimal Dev D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreerekha K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ashok Kumar P.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 6,00,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Cost
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the basis for the plaintiff's claim regarding the agreement for sale and the advance payment made.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Examination Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This report was marked as evidence to support the court's evaluation of the claims made.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Jayasree Santhosh vs Sajamma et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Jayasree Santhosh vs Sajamma et al regarding recovery of money