Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 75/2025

Case between Jayanthakumari Gangadharan vs Bindhu.S regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 10/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jayanthakumari Gangadharan, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Bindhu.S. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has been trespassing and threatening her regarding alleged debts.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's request for a permanent prohibitory injunction was granted by the court, which ruled in her favor.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant and her men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's request for a permanent prohibitory injunction was granted by the court, which ruled in her favor.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was supported by evidence, including a sale deed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's case was supported by evidence, including a sale deed.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendant and her men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and the house situated therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayanthakumari Gangadharan
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu.S
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 1924/2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raji. C.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant and her men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and the house situated therein and from causing any obstructions to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Thus, the point is found infavour of the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A1, Sale deed dated 18/10/2023 would substantiate the case of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayanthakumari Gangadharan vs Bindhu.S regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Jayanthakumari Gangadharan vs Bindhu.S regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won