Case Summary
Petitioner Jameela filed a restoration petition against respondent Hajiyaray Purakkal Ubaid, seeking to allow the restoration petition on payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition on payment of costs
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition on payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
IA is dismissed. Heard both counsel, since it is a restoration petition of the restoration petition. I am inclined to allow it on terms of Rs.1500/-.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jameela
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hajiyaray Purakkal Ubaid
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration petition allowed on payment of costs
Evidence:
IA is dismissed. Heard both counsel, since it is a restoration petition of the restoration petition. I am inclined to allow it on terms of Rs.1500/-.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.P
Case Code Year
2017