Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.131/2021

Case between Jagadeepan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding lease and rent control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jagadeepan filed a petition against Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding a lease matter. The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioner was absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence. The respondent was represented in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence. The respondent was represented in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the petition is dismissed for default with costs of respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jagadeepan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Stamp on Rent Control Petition, Stamp on Vakalath, Stamp on petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sakhi Gopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.A. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen K. Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldho Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyaric Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hani P. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner and their counsel.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition is dismissed for default with costs of respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Jagadeepan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding lease and rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Jagadeepan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding lease and rent control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won