Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.474/2018

Case between Indira et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding partition

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam.
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-7 years 11 months
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Indira and others seeking to partition a property. The defendants include Suresh Babu and others, but neither party was represented during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default as neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 29 th day of October, 2025)

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indira
Party Age
86
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayarajan
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Surendran
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valsalakumari
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rekha
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ratheesh
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remya
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.A. Priji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sunimol
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N. Vinayachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rahul V.I
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P. Sajinath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Swathi G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haran Das
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of both plaintiff and defendant.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Indira et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Indira et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 10/29/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A.K.Nazimudeen vs Shaima Shaharudeen et al regarding Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajan vs Sasidharan et al regarding partition.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pradeep B. vs Peethambari et al regarding declaration and partition
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mathew.W (Mathukutty) vs Sosamma et al regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won