Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed suit for injunction against three defendants, but the suit was dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Illimoottil Herold Dioz
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o. Chakko
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anila Daizy Dioz
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- Wb. Herold Dioz
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Issac Pandaraparambil
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o. Saimon
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariya @ Moli
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/ollssac Pandaraparambil
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Renold @ Kuttan
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- So. Poovath Adam
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Illimoottil Herold Dioz et al vs Issac Pandaraparambil et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Illimoottil Herold Dioz et al vs Issac Pandaraparambil et al regarding injunction