Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.300 OF 2016

Case between Harshad et al vs V Shamsudheen et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-03-31
Duration
1 year 22 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/31/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two plaintiffs, Harshad et al filed a suit for injunction against defendants which was later referred to arbitration for settling disputes as per the Arbitration Agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was disposed of after parties were referred to arbitration to settle their disputes as per the Arbitration Agreement.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was disposed of after parties were referred to arbitration to settle their disputes as per the Arbitration Agreement.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. As per order in IA. 2073/2016, the parties are referred to the Arbitration to settle their disputes and differences, in view of the Arbitration Agreement. The suit is disposed off accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harshad
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o Mohamed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harshad
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o Hamzakoya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V Shamsudheen
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o Abdurahiman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.P. Musthafa
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o Kauttusa Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Mohamedali Babu
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o P.M. Ahamedkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaisal
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o Mohamedali
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Harshad et al vs V Shamsudheen et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Harshad et al vs V Shamsudheen et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 03/09/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/31/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 03/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 03/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won