Case Summary
Harikrishnan, the petitioner, filed for eviction against Mejo K.J., the respondent, due to a breach of the lease agreement. The petitioner contended that the respondent used the property for commercial purposes and made unauthorized alterations.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order of eviction against the respondent to deliver vacant possession of the premises.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner successfully proved that the respondent violated the lease terms.
The petitioner successfully proved that the respondent violated the lease terms.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed with costs as follows. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Harikrishnan (56 years)
T.C. 27/2638, Kochu Kettidom, FOR A C2, Forest Lane, Vazhuthacaud, Trivandrum-695 014
Defendants
Mejo K.J. (42 years)
Kundukulam House, Parappur, Tholur, Thrissur, Pin-680 552
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed with costs as follows. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the schedule building under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the schedule building under Section 11(4)(ii) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court acknowledged the legal notice dated 22.01.2020 sent by the petitioner to the respondent seeking vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Unserved Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced the unserved cover containing the original lawyer notice that was returned due to the respondent's fictitious address.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court relied on the lease agreement to establish the nature of the tenancy and evidences of the terms violated by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3