Case Summary
Hareesh Prabhakar and Sai Sumana M.P. are petitioners seeking compliance with an order related to rent arrears. Mathew George is the respondent who has failed to comply with the court's instructions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with prior orders regarding rent arrears. As a consequence, the court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court’s orders and did not show sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the court’s orders and did not show sufficient cause for the non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under Section 12 was not complied with so far by the respondent.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HAREESH PRABHAKAR
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SAI SUMANA M.P.
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mathew George
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Order in IA 02/2025 dated 04.08.2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jijo Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. D. Beena
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aneesh James
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nafeesathul Misriya
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Babu Cherukara
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jees Martin
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Order under Section 12 of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document was used to determine the compliance issues related to rent payment by the respondent.
Reference:
IA 02/2025
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hareesh Prabhakar et al vs Mathew George regarding compliance with rent control orders.
Case Code Year
Case between Hareesh Prabhakar et al vs Mathew George regarding compliance with rent control orders.