Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 45/2025

Case between Hareesh Prabhakar et al vs Mathew George regarding compliance with rent control orders.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
approximately-1 month 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Hareesh Prabhakar and Sai Sumana M.P. are petitioners seeking compliance with an order related to rent arrears. Mathew George is the respondent who has failed to comply with the court's instructions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with prior orders regarding rent arrears. As a consequence, the court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court’s orders and did not show sufficient cause for the non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

HAREESH PRABHAKAR (47 years) Harishree, 8/1596, Vamanan Master Lane, AK Road, Koovapadam, Mattancherry P.O., Pin.682002, Mattancherry Village, Kochi Taluk, Ernakulam District SAI SUMANA M.P. (46 years) B1, Poornasree Apartments, Chinmaya Mission Road, Nadama Desom, Thripunithura PO, Pin-682301, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Mathew George (63 years) Apartment No. 2-D, Shell Crest Apartments, Vadakkekotta, Thripunithura PO, Pin code 682 301, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order under Section 12 of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was used to determine the compliance issues related to rent payment by the respondent.
Reference:
IA 02/2025

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/04/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases