Case Summary
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for the realisation of money. The defendant and plaintiff were represented in the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to balance court fee not being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Girija
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deepa.T.S.
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.S.Rajiv Thevally
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Paul Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suseela Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint filed by the plaintiff for Realisation of Money was rejected.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Girija vs Deepa.T.S. regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Girija vs Deepa.T.S. regarding Realisation of Money