Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 18/2024

Case between Geetha Das alias Geetha Bai et al vs Mrs. Rejani R. Nair regarding compliance of rent control order

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Geetha Das and Dr. Biju Anand, are seeking compliance of a rent control order against the respondent, Mrs. Rejani R. Nair, who has failed to comply with the order for more than one and a half months.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ordered the respondent to comply with the previous rent order, as sufficient cause for non-compliance was not shown.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order under IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Geetha Das alias Geetha Bai (78 years years) 'Nithyageetha', KRL Road, Thripunithura P.O., PIN­682 301 Dr. Biju Anand (52 years years) 'Nithyageetha, KRL Road, Thripunithura P.O., PIN­682 301

Defendants

Mrs. Rejani R. Nair (Age not specified years) Proprietor, 'Padmanidhi The Blouse Boutique', HIG­7, 10th Cross Road, Near Cold Stone Creamery Panampilly Nagar, Panampilly Nagar P.O., PIN ­ 682 036, Residing at 68A, 'Padmanidhi EMSRA, Behind Abad Nucleus Mall Maradu P.O., Kochi ­ 682 304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases