Case Summary
The petitioners, Geetha Das and Dr. Biju Anand, are seeking compliance of a rent control order against the respondent, Mrs. Rejani R. Nair, who has failed to comply with the order for more than one and a half months.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has ordered the respondent to comply with the previous rent order, as sufficient cause for non-compliance was not shown.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order under IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order under IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order under IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order under IA 2/2024 and did not show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geetha Das alias Geetha Bai
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Biju Anand
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Rejani R. Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reji George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manju Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saisankar S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Renjth B. Marar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Lakshmni N. Kaimal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Poomulli
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajkumar P.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Preetha S. Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anand Remesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhijith S. Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rekha R.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Keshavraj Nair P.T.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Geetha Das alias Geetha Bai et al vs Mrs. Rejani R. Nair regarding compliance of rent control order
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha Das alias Geetha Bai et al vs Mrs. Rejani R. Nair regarding compliance of rent control order