Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 288 OF 2016

Case between Fathima et al vs Pathimbeevi et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-03
Duration
1 year 11 months 19 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs Fathima and Supple.2.Shafi filed a suit against defendants seeking injunction. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client and the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client and the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Fathima (34 years) Kuriyante Purakkal House, Mangalam amsom, Kootayi desom, Tirur Taluk Supple.2.Shafi (42 years) Kuriyante Purakkal House, Mangalam amsom, Kootayi desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Pathimbeevi (60 years) Moonnodikkal House, Mangalam amsom, Koottayi desom & Post, Tirur Taluk Moosa (42 years) Kuriyante Purakkal House, Mangalam amsom, Kootayi desom & Post, Tirur Taluk Shafi (42 years) Kuriyante purakkal House, Mangalam amsom, Kootayi desom, Tirur Taluk

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 02/03/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases