Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.9 89/2021

Case between Faizal M A vs M/s Sree Shailam Chit Funds Finance regarding mandatory injunction

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-11-12
Duration
approximately-8 years
Case Closed
Tue, 11/12/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Faizal M A and Shahanas V A are husband and wife, suing M/s Sree Shailam Chit Funds Finance for the return of title documents after their chitty transactions. They claim the defendant has not returned documents despite the completion of the chitty agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the defendant to return the original partition deed and other documents to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were also awarded costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to handover the original partition deed and other documents to the plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the defendant to return the original partition deed and other documents to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were also awarded costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case, proving that the defendant failed to return the title deeds despite multiple requests.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their case, proving that the defendant failed to return the title deeds despite multiple requests.
Supporting Evidence
The cause of action disclosed is found to be true as it remains unchallenged. The evidence proves that the defendant has received the title deeds as alleged by the plaintiffs and has not returned them.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1)The defendant is directed to handover the original partition deed No.3459/2011 of Edappally SRO and the original release deed No.8270/2004 of Edappally SRO along with all other documents by way of mandatory injunction to the plaintiffs...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Faizal M A
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahanas V A
Party Age
31
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Sree Shailam Chit Funds Finance
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Chitty Passbook No.1, Original Chitty Passbook No.2, Original Chitty Passbook No.3, Letter of acknowledgment confirming receipt of title deeds.
Defendants Documents
Copy of notice sent by the defendant to the plaintiff, Statement of accounts of the plaintiffs maintained by the defendant.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Millu Dandapani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rameez Nooh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sushanth J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Mandatory injunction directing the defendant to handover the original partition deed and other documents to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to handover the original partition deed No.3459/2011 of Edappally SRO and the original release deed No.8270/2004 of Edappally SRO along with all other documents by way of mandatory injunction to the plaintiffs.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, plaintiffs are entitled to get the costs of the proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Chitty Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Chitty Passbook No.1 issued by the defendant pertaining to chitty No. SJ:4/3 in the name of the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Chitty Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Chitty Passbook No.2 issued by the defendant pertaining to chitty No. SJ:4/3 in the name of the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Chitty Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Chitty Passbook No.3 issued by the defendant pertaining to chitty No. SJ:4/3 in the name of the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Payment receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original payment receipts issued by the defendant in the name of the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of acknowledgment issued by the defendant confirming the receipt of the title deeds, prior deeds and documents of the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of release deed no. 8270/1/2004 of SRO, Edappally.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt for the period 2022-23 issued from Edappally South Village Office.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint filed by the plaintiff before the SHO, Elamakkara Police Station along with Acknowledgment receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the lawyer notice issued by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal Acknowledgment card signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of notice sent by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Postal Acknowledgment card signed by the 1st plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original of notice sent by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Statement of accounts of the plaintiffs maintained by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original Cheque no. 918326 for Rs. 1,50,000/- of Bharatiya Mahila Bank issued in favour of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Cheque Return Memo.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Oral evidence
Relevance:
Oral evidence from the witness PW1.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Faizal M A vs M/s Sree Shailam Chit Funds Finance regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Faizal M A vs M/s Sree Shailam Chit Funds Finance regarding mandatory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 11/08/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/12/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Sheeba Thambi regarding recovery of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. et al vs Franson Silver Rock, Laly Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema vs Sajana regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sahala Jalal vs Jinson M.D regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sophy K. M. et al regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won