Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 132/2022

Case between E.K. Antony vs K.M. Subair regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

E.K. Antony filed a petition for eviction against K.M. Subair under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The case was resolved through mediation, leading to the petition being closed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement. As a result, the petition was closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement. As a result, the petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Heard on the terms of mediation agreement. They are found lawful and hence, accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is closed recording the terms of mediation agreement dated 30.01.2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
E.K. Antony
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M. Subair
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T. Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashitha S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayasankar S.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Althaf P.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abey Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.C. Sajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The mediation agreement was accepted by the court and formed the basis for closing the petition.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E.K. Antony vs K.M. Subair regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between E.K. Antony vs K.M. Subair regarding eviction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Babu. K. Putheth vs Muhammed Rameez M.J. regarding eviction under Section 11(2) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Renjini S. vs RaphiMon M.E. regarding eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between T.V. Devaprasad vs View Point Life Styles et al regarding Eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mary Philomina P.G. vs Harisree Trading Company regarding Eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob Vadakel vs Mr. V P Jackson regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won